Thursday, 22 September 2016

1,2,3,7: The Clavicula of our Simulation, Gematria and Katapayadi



In previous posts I have already shown that the number 273 seems to be a peculiar constant related to our Solar system, temperature and procreation. This number shows up so often that it is nearly impossible that this could be a coincidence. Rather it seems to be a kind of message from a higher intelligence who therewith announces its presence. In my philosophy of pancomputational panpsychism this implies, that we are living in a simulation.

In the present article I will go a bit deeper into the numerical signature which seems to be some kind of key, a clavicula, to decode the message of our simulators.

Let me first summarise my previous findings to numbers containing the sequence of the ciphers 2,7 and 3:

1.      The diameters of the Earth and Moon (7920 miles and 2160 miles, which is 11x6! and 3x6! miles, respectively) are in the ratio of 11 to 3, 11 ÷ 3= 3.7 (to be precise: 3.66), while 3 ÷ 11 = 0.273. There are almost 366 days in a year, which is the rotation time of the Earth around the Sun. In fact there are 366 so-called sidereal days in a year.
2.      The 3:11 ratio is also invoked by Venus and Mars, as the ratio of the closest to farthest distance. The ratio that each experiences of the other is 3:11. As we know, the fraction 3/11 rounds to 27.3%.
3.      27.3 is also the number of days it takes for the Moon to orbit the Earth.
4.      27.3 days is even the average rotation period of a sunspot.
5.      The acceleration ratio of the Moon in its path around the Earth is measured as 0.273 × cm/s2. In fact, the acceleration of the Earth and the Moon behave reciprocally as the squares of the radii of the orbits of the Earth and the Moon.
6.      Moreover, 273 m/s2 is the acceleration of the Sun!

7.      The Moon controls the movement of water around the Earth, ebb and flow. When water is consequently set as the standard for measuring temperature, Absolute Zero, the temperature at which all atomic movement comes to an absolute halt, is -273.2° C.
8.      According to the experiments of Gay-Lussac, when a gas is either heated or cooled by 1 degree Centigrade, it expands or contracts respectively by 1/273.2 of its previous volume.
9.      The triple point of water is defined to take place at 273.16 K.
10.  The Cosmic Background Radiation is 2.73 K.


11.  All medical students are required to memorize that a pregnancy (read: life developing in water) is calculated on the basis of a 10-sidereal month period of 273 days from conception to birth, which is 9 “regular” months. 27 divided by 3 gives 9.
12.  A woman’s menstrual cycle is on average 27.3 days.

13.  If a circle is drawn with a radius from the centre of the Earth through the centre of the Moon, the perimeter of the square around the Earth and this circle are one and the same! It also reveals how the Moon and the Earth have resolved the puzzle of the squaring of the circle. In other words, if the Moon could roll around the Earth, the circle made by its centre has a circumference precisely equal to the perimeter of a square around the Earth (when Pi is approximated by its ancient, traditional ratio of 22/7 = 3.14). Comparing a square’s perimeter to a circle having an equal circumference, the circle’s diameter is 27.3% longer than the edge of the square. Inscribe a circle inside a square.
14.   The four corners make up 27.32% of the total area.

15.  There are 273 days from the summer solstice to the vernal equinox.
16.  Furthermore, 2,730,000 is the circumference of the Sun in miles.

17.  About 108 diameters of the Earth fit across the diameter of the Sun.
18.  About 108 Sun diameters fit in between Earth and Sun. 
19.  About 108 Moon diameters fit between Earth and Moon.

(In fact the number in items 17-19 is 109.2, which in fact is precisely 4x27,3, the intelligence signature number we saw before).

Another important constant we encounter in physics is the fine structure constant of Hydrogen, alpha (0.0073), in which we encounter again two of the digits of 273.
1/alpha =137.  The scientist Pauli was obsessed with the archetypical meaning of numbers in particular number 137, which  unintendedly also turned out to be the number of the room in which he died. A Synchronicity. Pauli shared his fascination for numbers and in particular 137 with the psychologist Jung, who is the conceptual father of the notions archetype and synchronicity. Note that our universe is said to exist 13,7 billion years.

Strangely enough the ciphers making up 273 reproduce 137 in the following manner: 27+37+73 =137. And 37/27=1.37. 1,2,3 and 7 are four of the five first mathematical “Lucas numbers”, a variation related to the Fibonacci series.

37 itself is strongly related to 137. 372+1=137. 237=1.37...x1011, 37!=1.37..x1043.
37 is the human body temperature. There are 37 trillion cells in a human body. 37 is the golden section of an hour. 137,5° the complement of the golden section of a circle. The remaining 222° are 2x3x37.

1,2,3 and 7 are related in more than one way, for instance via 27x37=2701 and 237=1.37...x1011
1/27=0.37037.. 1/37=0.27027.
There are 12,37 full moons in a year.
37 is the 12th prime number, 73 the 21st.
27x37=999, which, if we forget the powers of 10 is very close to unity.
The mass of the Moon is 1/3x1/27=1/81th of the mass of the Earth.
273=3x7x13 or 21x13.
273x137=37401
13 itself is 2x3+7. As 13 is the number of closely packed spheres in the so-called “Vector Equilibrium” (cuboctahedron, the basic unit of the Akasha, the ether in Hinduism), consisting of a central layer of 7 spheres and an upper and lower layer of three spheres, it can be said that the basic unit of Akasha itself encodes the 1,2,3 and 7.

27 is the number of bones in a human hand. There are about 1027 atoms in the human body.
The ciphers of the speed of light (186282 miles/second) add up to 27: 1+8+6+2+8+2=27. The adding up of ciphers of a number is also called the Indig of a number.

The multiples of 27 such as 54, 108, 432 and 864 are found in numerous relations of time, space and music. They are also key values in Hinduism and Buddhism.
E.g. there are 86400 seconds in a day, the diameter of the Sun is 864000 miles. The Sun and Sirius are 8,64 light years apart. 27x32=864. 432 is a time cycle number in various religions and cultures, from Hinduism to Mayan, from Biblical to Sumerian. 432 squared (186624) is very close to the speed of light and its Indig is 27 again.

27 and 37 together make 64 (27+37=64), which is the number of DNA codons and I Ching permutations. 64+73=137 Q.E.D. 64 corresponds to “prophesy” in Kabbalah and 73 to “wisdom”.

Multiples of 3 times 37 always generate a number of the form nnn. 3x37=111 and hence 6x37=222 etc. Most interesting here are the 18x37=666 or (6+6+6)x37=666 and 27x37=999 or (9+9+9)x37=999.

37 is not only an octagonal number, it is also both a hexagonal number and a hexagram number. Thus it is the first trifigurate number. Its inverse 73 is a hexagram or Star number as well with the 37 hexagon inside. 13 is the first hexagram, with a core of 7 spheres. Again we see the 1,3 and 7.



As already said 37x18=666, but also note that 73=37+6x6.
Tesla said: “If you only knew the magnificence of the 3,6 and 9 then you would have a key to the universe.” Funny enough the remaining numbers 1,4,2,8,5,7 together form 27 (3x9) and the permutations thereof can be ordered in a 6x6 magic square, in which each row yields 27 as sum.
The second trifigurate number is 91 (13x7). 91 spheres can be ordered as triangle, hexagon and pyramid.
37 is the fourth hexagonal number if we include 1. The sum of the three preceding hexagonal numbers 1+7+19=27.
Thus 1,2,3 and 7 are also extremely important in the genesis of form.

Due to its relation with the so-called “number of the Beast” (666=18x37) from revelation 13:18, the Bible fanatics are fond of finding all kind of relations with 37. Noteworthy, 137 is the 33rd prime number, 33 is related to the length of life of Jesus in years.
The word Kabbalah has a Gematria value of 137. The number 6 is used 273 times in the Bible.

The most elaborate and impressive collection thereof can be found on the so-called “Biblewheel” site (http://www.biblewheel.com//GR/GR_37.php).

Religious occultism is fond of “Gematria”. Gematria assigns values to each letter of a word and by adding those gives the Gematria value of a word. Words with the same or similar Gematria value are considered to bear a strong relation. It is permissible to add or subtract the value of one Aleph (1) in order to still have a related meaning. Thus the Gematria of the name of God in Hebrew (YHWH), which is 26 is related to 27. The perfect number 28 (i.e. it is the sum of its divisors) is also related to 27. Interestingly 137x2=274, which is therefore Gematrically identical to 273.
Interestingly the Gematria value of the Greek “he kleis” (the key) is 273. This is also the value of “klesis” (calling) and “hiram abiff”, the all-seeing eye. The Hebrew Gematria value of the Greek word “Gematria” is 273.

Likewise interesting is the suggestion by the Biblewheel, that the first verse of Genesis (the Gematria of which yields 2701=37x73) is a “Creation holograph”. 37 is also the value of the gematria of the word of God.
The author of the “Biblewheel” first went berserk in a kind of Apotheosis-singularity experience, in which every gematrical relation fitted in a beautiful scheme and then himself started to debunk his findings in his dark night of the Soul being lost in the quagmire of agnosticism.

In my book Technovedanta 2.0, I show that other religions made similar claims: Hinduism claims the first verse of the Rg Veda to be a creation holograph, Islam does the same with the first verse of the Qu’ran. These religions also have their variants of Gematria. The Hindu shloka (verse) gopiibhaagya madhuvraataH shruMgashodadhi saMdhigaH .
khalajiivitakhaataava galahaalaa rasaMdharaH
encodes pi up to 31 decimal places.

Because these religions also have their own Gematria system (called Katapayadi in Hinduism and Abjad in Islam), with equally impressive results and because these different religions contradict each other, it cannot be so that they all represent the word of God (which they claim), in an equally truthful manner. Thus unlike these religious zealots, I do not conclude the correctness of a religion based on its impressive Gematria results. In Technovedanta I argue that the writers of these books were perhaps telepathically influenced (in a manner unknown to themselves) by entities from a higher intelligence or even higher dimension (our simulators?).

The agenda of these entities is not necessarily benign. Although they give numerical clues and keys about the simulated structure of our universe, they have also created a great deal of confusion and suffering, by being the instigators of the mutual oppositions of the different opposing religious factions. Therefore we cannot rely on the moral prescriptions of these religious books, but we can use them in our deciphering of the key to the ontogenesis of our universe.

At least it is worthwhile further figuring out how these values relate to physical processes and constants in order to increase our Technological dominion over physicality – which in panpsychic terms means to subdue the lesser spirits of Solomon’s Goetia. But if we truly crack this code, we may even be able to connect with our simulators and commune with the greater spirits of Solomon’s Theurgia. Or I am now venturing into the realm of Satan’s pride, wishing to be “K’Elohim”, “like the Gods”, which terminology has a Gematria value of 666.

Personally, I think that if the Gods or simulators put so much effort in devising such an encryption, which they knew would be deciphered one day, they also meant it to be so. It seems to me that then it is also their wish that we become like them, without there being any animosity or wrathfulness, because we would have been too “proud”, too audacious to venture in their realm. 1,2,3,7 is not a forbidden fruit. It is not the tower of Babel. It is our rightful heritage to become K’Elohim.

Sunday, 18 September 2016

An introduction into Transcendental Metaphysics



Since the dawn of civilisation mankind has pondered deep philosophical questions such as “Do I exist? How do I know I exist? What is knowledge? What is consciousness? What is reality made of? Why is there something rather than nothing? Do we have a free will? What is the meaning of life? What is time? Where do good and evil come from? Does God exist?”

Most of these questions traditionally belong to the branch of philosophy that deals with the first principles of things and involve abstracted concepts about being, knowing, substance, cause, identity, time and space. This branch is well known as “Metaphysics”.

Unlike physics, which takes the metaphysical questions for granted and merely describes the behaviour of every physical, material manifestation that can be measured, the metaphysical questions seduce us to speculate about those issues that are deemed to go beyond the physical.

However, the technological mastering of less tangible “subject-matter” such as energy and information (which nowadays can be transmitted wireless via e.g. “Wi-Fi”) and the weird quantum-mechanic behaviour of matter at its apparently most fundamental scales, have blurred the borders between physics and metaphysics.

Strangely enough, despite the undeniable evidence from quantum-mechanics that the behaviour of matter is influenced by observation, the vast majority of scientists still adheres to a completely obsolete 17th century classical physics paradigm of the universe as mechanical clockwork. A philosophy called “Materialism”.

It seems as if scientists have not fully realised the implications of the basic tenet from quantum mechanics: “Whenever you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change”.

In the September 2016 issue of the New Scientist, which was dedicated to the topic of metaphysics, it became crystal clear to me that many scientists still believe that mind and consciousness magically emerge from a kind of billiard ball interactions between particulate material objects.

This is not possible, if quantum-mechanics is right. Rather, quantum-mechanics shows us that the influence of consciousness changes the behaviour of matter at its most fundamental scales. In order to do so, matter and consciousness must share the same energetic language to interact. Matter must be aware somehow of an influence exerted thereon, it must be able to sense the influence of consciousness and then react on it. This means that matter must have the quality of sensing input, processing the information and responding with an output of energetic information. This ability to sense, feedback and react are aspects, which we usually only attribute to the consciousness of living entities.

Could it be that scientists consider this issue the wrong way around? That it is not consciousness which emerges from matter, but matter which emerges from consciousness?

Terrence McKenna used to criticise the materialist stance as follows: “Object fetishism is completely bankrupt”.

In my previous book “Technovedanta”1, which has as one of its subtitles “A panpsychic Theory of Everything”, I defend the thesis that every material particulate entity at its most fundamental level has a very minute type of consciousness. It is aware of the influences of its surroundings. This is usually known as “Animism”, “Hylozoism” or “Panpsychism”. The opponents of “Panpsychism” often argue that it is a na├»ve theory, which considers inanimate objects such as a rock or a chair as being imbued with consciousness. However, in my definition Panpsychism does not mean that non-evolved aggregate objects, have an overall object-consciousness. With non-evolved aggregate objects I mean objects, which did not naturally evolve by their own force, but were put together by coincidence by nature so as to create e.g. rocks, or intentionally by man so as to create e.g. chairs or thermostats. Only the self-generated, self-evolved and self-sustaining (i.e. autopoietic) constituents such as the atoms or molecules of these entities are considered to have a certain level of consciousness in my theory.

I also defend the thesis that the ultimate foundation for matter is consciousness: Particulate matter arises as a kind of vortexes within an ocean of conscious energy. This is a type of “Idealism”. If the vortex is self-sustaining, it can be considered as a sensing entity. The universe of matter and energy forms a kind of Mind in the ocean of a cosmic all-encompassing consciousness.

Departing from this point of view, the physical appears to be embedded in the metaphysical realm of consciousness. This perspective of the “primacy of consciousness” leads to a collection of very different answers to the questions posed at the beginning of this chapter, when compared to those given by the science establishment. Many of those questions were in fact addressed in my book Technovedanta, although some finer points may have been left unanswered for the critical reader.

In particular, the rapid evolution of Technology appears to be heading towards what is nowadays called the “Technological Singularity”. The Technological Singularity is a point in the history of mankind (and its possibly artificial intelligent progeny), beyond which our future predictions and speculations become pointless, as this Technology explosion will transcend our way of living completely and dramatically beyond compare. Transhumanists hope it will grant us immortality and other Godlike properties if we succeed in uploading ourselves to a computational substrate and merge with artificial intelligence. We will then inhabit a world, in which we can shape a simulated virtual reality (or a plurality thereof) as our “new reality”.

In the ruling belief of the Singularitarians our consciousness is merely the consequence of material interactions in our brains. Once we become able to fully upload a copy of our brain with a granularity that at least shows all individual synaptic links between individual neurons, we will automatically have a copy of our consciousness emerge in the computing substrate; at least so the Singularitarians believe. Although agreeing with the Singularitarians that a kind of Singularity will one day be achieved, my panpsychic stance makes me a heretic, cursing in the “Turing church” (the name of the quasi-religious movement of “Transhumanism”).
 
One of the points I myself had difficulty in fully fitting in my “Theory of Everything” (T.O.E), was the apparent irreconcilability between my theory of “Panpsychism” and the fact that I have noticed numerous strong indicators (which will be discussed in a later chapter) that we are indeed living in some kind of computer simulation.

In my next book this paradox will be resolved and it will show that “Panpsychism” and “Pancomputationalism” are not mutually exclusive concepts and that we are indeed very likely living some kind of computer simulation. Not a fully predetermined computer simulation in which we hardly have any freedom of action, but a quantum computer simulation, which fully reacts and depends on our actions and being. A participatory simulation.



The T.O.E. developed in the Technovedanta series shows that the dividing line between physics and metaphysics is an arbitrary one. In fact, everything that exists is embedded in the sole entity that cannot be considered as “existing-as we know it”, but which is rather the subsisting “Primordial Consciousness” (the PC). A priori it would seem that in Technovedanta only Primordial Consciousness could be considered as “metaphysical” and that the whole of existence is “physical”. Yet this is an incorrect dualistic interpretation. Technovedanta is monist (although dual aspect oriented): As every “physical” manifestation is an expression of the metaphysical primordial consciousness, it is more correct to state that there is no physical nature existing apart from its metaphysical source. Hence everything is ultimately metaphysical and the idea that there is a separate physical nature an illusion.

As the PC will moreover be shown to have a pancomputational aspect and is the expression of the “Highest Transcendence”, “Cosmic self” or “Purusha” (note that I do not mention the unclear terminology “God”), the term “Personal Computer” is a kind of synonym of the Primordial Consciousness.

My next book will moreover question the very foundations of our knowledge and dive into the very question of Epistemology: What is knowable at all? I hope I will succeed in convincing you that logic, science or religion are all uncertain ways to come to correct knowledge. Yet I will attempt to indicate where technology can help us to find the most promising way forward out of this quagmire of uncertainty and turn us into Gods ourselves. I will also speculate on the transfinite possibilities of the Highest Transcendence, the Transcendental subject and object at the end of time (called the “Eschaton” by “Terrence McKenna” and “Omega point” by Teilhard de Chardin). Here my metaphysical theory culminates in an absolute Transcendence of everything that can possibly be transcended both physically and conceptually, so that this book rightfully can claim to address the topic of “Transcendental Metaphysics”.

Friday, 9 September 2016

Announcement about my next book

Most of the posts in this blog have been transformed into chapters of my next book. I have taken out the bulk of each chapter, so that what is left in the posts is now a kind of teaser. The book also contains additional chapters. I have submitted the book for publication, but I am still waiting for approval.

In the meantime, to tickle your curiosity, here is a teaser for the new book:



"Have you ever read a book, which logically shows where logic is absurd? A book, which scientifically shows where science fails? A meta-philosophy, which shows where philosophy is useless?

Welcome to the book of books. A Clavicula to open the gates of Hell and Heaven to summon the forces of Mind and Matter. A quest into the deepest realm, where reality and imagination fade into each other like pictorial values.

A journey into the Highest Transcendence, Consciousness.
The final frontier.
These are the voyages of the Epistemonauts. Their ongoing mission:
To seek out the Magick of Technology and the Technology of Magick, to boldly go where no one has gone before, where the grand Union of all possible perspectives and the sole true Theory of Everything lies:
“Everything is hereby incorporated by reference.”

From the primordial Sense to the scattered kaleidoscopic reverberations in the Hall of Mirrors; the octaves and scales of Ouroboric existence, the mighty worm of digital virtualisation.

This is my gift to you: To free you from any belief system, to free you from the chains of your self-inflicted prison of Mind. Fear not to be left in the agnostic Limbo, even if I won't lead you to your Gods; instead I will show you the Technology, which one day will make a God of you.

Meet me at the junction where Vedic and Buddhist spirituality join Science, and I will show you what lies beyond the Technological Singularity."